The 2013 bike lanes are probably not the answer to our commuting mix, but this is a step forward and hopefully this passion builds so the City puts some actual money into bike infrastructure. Cars rule Edmonton now, but they don’t have to rule forever and a true metropolis has to have a mix.

Firstly, I don’t believe the ‘rights’ of motorists (and one could argue they don’t have rights, it’s a privilege to drive) are not in fact being trampled on, but the attempt is to create better balance on the street between various modes of transport.

Secondly, public parking is also not a right for your private vehicle. There is a righteousness amoungst some car drivers that significant amounts of public property be set aside for cars. There is lots of research and urban planning to suggest that parking is a very wasteful use of public space and does not ensure the vitality of an area or street. That said, I do support a mix of vehicles, bikes, and pedestrian, including street parking, where that can be achieved. For example, loading zones are important to independent businesses. But not at the expense of better balance on the street that could include bike infrastructure.

In terms of 76 Avenue corridor specifically and practically – where else would you put it if it’s not there? 82 Avenue is not an option, as isn’t Argyll Road. There is not other way to cross Mill Creek Ravine, and the bike commuter use would be that much higher than a few lost parking stalls. Bike commuting does not equal recreational biking!

The current bike plan included over 3 years of consultation. Was that consultation process perfect, probably not. It should be noted that we are only spending $1m per year on bike infrastructure. Heaven forbid what would happen if Council ever planned to spend more! Graham simply is not educated on the subject and that is very unfortunate given the influence he could have for constructive dialogue.